Milton Friedman vs the Austrian Perspective

Posted on by

So you are a good free market Chicago School guy.  You have rejected Keynesian economics in favor of the free market Chicago school.  You have read Milton Friedman’s “Right to Choose” and you are convinced that the free market is the way to go.

Well, maybe he is not such a free market guy.  He is, in fact, in favor of compulsory taxation, monopoly, price controls, and the welfare state.  Milton Friedman proposed the tyrannical payroll deduction in the United Sates during WW2 and it has stuck with us like a curse ever since.  He is against cartels in most areas except for money.  Though Chicago School has done many positive things in promoting liberty, its faults are glaring and can no longer be ignored after September 2008. The Chicago School was fundamental in popularizing the idea that almost all government regulations are actually lobbied for and constructed by the industries that are to be regulated to push out competition and raise costs for new competitors entering the sector.  This allows large firms to absorb regulatory costs while pushing out small businesses and new upstart companies.  The term popularized by many from the Chicago school is “Cui Bono” or who benefits?.  The Chicago School realized that in almost all cases, the big players in the industries being regulated are almost always the same beneficiaries of such regulations and are also the biggest pushers of regulation (just like today’s health care legislation and insurance companies.)  Chicago School has written hundreds of books on almost every industry when making their case but have somehow missed the elephant in the room, the Federal Reserve. So the largest monopoly of all escapes all scrutiny from the Chicago School.  Chicago School refuses to use this same method of “Cui Bono?” on the banking cartels that exist around the world in the form of Central Banks.  This seems absurd when considering that all the shareholders of central banks are private and have enormous leverage in setting the price for money (the interest rate).  So the Chicago School and Milton are completely inconsistent in their theories when it comes to money.  They are for free competition in all fields except for banking, where the Chicago school supports government sponsered monopoly.

When it comes to methodology, the Chicago School is as bad if not worse than the Keynesians.  The Chicago School and every other school of economic thought besides the Austrian School since the 1930s have viewed human beings as mathematical aggregates.  That is to say, human beings are simply numbers to be put in mathematical formulas.  The Austrian School completely rejects this because human beings are conscious actors that change their behaviors based on conditions. For example if you raise the income tax, some people will likely find other ways to generate income through investment or some other method.  Therefore, human behavior and concious actors will change how much revenue will be brought in.  All other schools of thought pretend that human behavior is for the most part unchanging and can be constructed as part of a mathematical formula. For example, if government action A is taken than B will be the result.  Ludwig Von Mises established in “Human Action” that human behavior cannot be predicted and observed in the same way that hard sciences make predictions. All particles in the universe act in the same predictable way when a force is applied to them. This is not true with human behavior.  When a new variable is applied to human interaction, humans will react in multiple different ways, each to achieve their own desired goals. Since economists can’t possibly know the goals and motives of every single person, it makes human beings almost impossible to predict the same way that chemists or other scientists make predictions with their respective studies.  This puts economics closer to the field of sociology rather than a hard science, i.e. physics, that mainstream economists’ fantasize about making economics into.  Human beings are conscious actors but the Chicago School’s methodology leads to many conclusions that are not logical because they often do not take this into account. Murray Rothbard gives the example of Milton Friedman’s negative income tax or guaranteed annual income.  Rothbard argues that it is precisely because the welfare bureaucracy is so inefficient that the United Sates is not more bankrupt than it is.  Friedman’s plan to make it more efficient by automatically sending out checks to anyone making below a certain income creates a hugely distorted incentive structure that is logically obvious but which Chicago School’s methodology seems unable to grasp.

Lastly if you still think that the Chicago School is free market consider this; Ben Bernanke is a student of the Chicago School, specifically Milton Friedman’s book on the Great Depression. Everything that Ben Bernanke has done has been lock step with what Milton Friedman had suggested should have been done during the Great Depression. Not one major economist from the Chicago School publicly protested against TARP or the mind boggling expansion of the money supply.  The Chicago School has completely capitulated to the Keynesian world view and have shown their true colors. The only school of thought that has not been toppled in the wake of September 2008 has been the Austrian School.

Here Gary North goes into some of the intellectual history of economics. Additionally, Gary North makes the argument that the intervention of 2008 was so massive that it was arguably taken even further than anything that Milton Friedman would have suggested thirty years ago.

Here is another lecture comparing Milton Friedman to the Keynesian paradigm.

Here is an article about how mainstream conservatives and supply siders are Keynesian.

 

1,681 thoughts on “Milton Friedman vs the Austrian Perspective”

  7. Excellent goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to and you’re just
    too fantastic. I actually like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you’re
    stating and the way in which you say it. You make
    it enjoyable and you still take care of to keep it
    wise. I can not wait to read much more from you. This is really a great site.

    Reply ↓

  8. you are really a just right webmaster. The web site loading
    speed is incredible. It sort of feels that you’re doing
    any unique trick. In addition, The contents are masterwork.
    you have done a great process in this topic!

    Reply ↓

  10. hello there and thank you for your information – I’ve certainly picked up something new from right here.
    I did however expertise some technical points using this web site, as I experienced
    to reload the website many times previous to I could
    get it to load properly. I had been wondering if your web hosting is OK?
    Not that I’m complaining, but slow loading instances times will very frequently affect your placement in google and could damage your quality
    score if ads and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I’m adding this RSS to my
    e-mail and could look out for much more of your respective intriguing content.
    Ensure that you update this again very soon.

    Reply ↓

  18. I have been surfing online more than three hours as of late, yet I by no
    means discovered any attention-grabbing article like
    yours. It is beautiful worth enough for me. Personally,
    if all site owners and bloggers made just right content material as you probably did, the internet
    will likely be a lot more helpful than ever before.

    Reply ↓

  20. Hmm it seems like your site ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I submitted and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I as well am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to the whole thing. Do you have any suggestions for first-time blog writers? I’d genuinely appreciate it.

    Reply ↓

  26. naturally like your web-site but you have to check the spelling on several of
    your posts. A number of them are rife with spelling issues and I to find it very bothersome to
    inform the truth on the other hand I’ll certainly come back again.

    Reply ↓

  36. I think this is one of the most important information for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But wanna remark on few general things, The website style is great, the articles is really nice : D. Good job, cheers

    Reply ↓

  38. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You definitely know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your blog when you could be giving us something enlightening to read?

    Reply ↓

  40. Hi, i feel that i saw you visited my web site so i got here to go back the prefer?.I am trying to find things to improve my site!I guess its good enough to use some of your concepts!!

    Reply ↓

  47. I’ve been exploring for a little bit for any high-quality articles or blog posts in this kind of area . Exploring in Yahoo I at last stumbled upon this web site. Reading this info So i’m satisfied to exhibit that I have a very just right uncanny feeling I came upon exactly what I needed. I so much without a doubt will make certain to don?t overlook this web site and give it a look on a continuing basis.

    Reply ↓

  49. Hi there! I’m at work browsing your blog from my new iphone 4!

    Just wanted to say I love reading through your blog and look forward
    to all your posts! Carry on the superb work!

    Reply ↓

  50. My developer is trying to persuade me to move to .net from PHP.
    I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses. But he’s tryiong none the less.
    I’ve been using WordPress on numerous websites for about a year and am concerned about switching to
    another platform. I have heard very good things about blogengine.net.
    Is there a way I can import all my wordpress posts into it?
    Any help would be really appreciated!

    Reply ↓

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *