The Deep Speculation on the Vax

Posted on by

I have been thinking for a while that obviously that this vax is harmful and likely very dangerous but I want to hear some deep speculation on it.  So many people are guarded when they talk about it because they are often medical or another type of professional and don’t want to speculate too much.  Though I understand that people don’t want to go out too far on a limb, I think it is about time that we start speculating on what the ramifications of these vaccinations are going to be.

Here is what we know.

  1.  Everything points to the fact the whole pandemic was planned years in advance.
  2.  There seem many purposes to this plan but the vaccine seems to be the end goal, everything was about injecting a new gene therapy “vaccine” into every human being on the planet.
  3. We know almost nothing about this vaccine.  No animal trials were done and already the death count is higher than all other vaccines of the last 30 years combined. revovler news chart vax deaths
  4. We also know that every alternative treatment has been covered up.

So what is all this about?  If there really was a new dangerous pandemic sweeping the world why use a total novel technology of the mRNA vaccine?  Why not use a traditional vaccine?  Wouldn’t a traditional vaccine be the most safe and prudent route?  Why no long term studies on animals?  Why is phycological warfare being used on the public?  How is the CDC and the WHO been wrong on almost every point and contradict there own standards of pandemic response?  Why not have a rigorous tracking system to find out what is happening with vaccine injuries for a vaccine that is brand new and developed in less than a year as opposed to the usual ten years?

Intelligent people already know something is up, so now is the time for some healthy speculation in this writer’s humble opinion.  Luckily, Mike Adams from Natural News and Omaha native Dr. Lee Merritt discuss some of the more wild possibilities with the vaccine along with many interesting details that they have been hearing.

People have often been reported to be in a trance like state after taking the vaccine.

Why did the virus not spread throughout the world in the same way it did in New York, Lombardy, and Wuhan?  After these initial hot zones the virus seemed to get much more mild.  Was there some kind of genetic poison attack on these cities?

Are there nano technology in these vaccines?  Could they affect brain function and alter mood?  Could they be used for mind control?

The behavior of mice has been changed in the past through magnetic effects.

A wide range of reports show that people are being magnetized.

The spike protein has been found in the ovaries at a much higher concentration than other parts of the body.  Dr Lee Merritt says that they have the technology to target certain organs.

Doctors and nurses were vaccinated first, even over the elderly, did this somehow effect the critical thinking ability of the doctors?

Most strangely of all, there have been reports of people’s pets attacking them after they have received the vaccine.  Also babies have refused to nurse from their mothers after their mothers have been vaccinated (reported in Israel).   Are these vaccines changing human beings in some way we don’t understand?

If people’s DNA is being changed are they still human?  What is human?

Mike Adams and Dr Lee Merritt tackle all these questions and more.  Interesting times for humanity lie ahead.

mad max art 1

 

68,881 thoughts on “The Deep Speculation on the Vax”

  9. Australian politicians are almost always opting to
    fly with Qantas on taxpayer-funded trips, despite Virgin offering cheaper tickets.

    Federal MPs flew with the national carrier for 80 per cent of work trips last year despite it not always being the cheapest route, according to travel data provided to the
    government.

    While politicians and their staffers are required to book the cheapest flight, it also
    has to be the most efficient, with Qantas offering the most routes between major cities.

    MPs are banned from accruing frequent flyer points
    on taxpayer-funded trips like ordinary Aussies can, but they can can receive lifetime status credits,
    which allows access to airport lounges and flight upgrades.

    ‘How else can one explain the extraordinary dominance of Qantas in securing bookings
    by parliamentarians and their staff?’ Myriam Robin wrote
    in an opinion piece for the Australian Financial Review.

    ‘There’s nothing like accruing status credits on someone else’s dime.’

    Transport Minister Catherine King has since
    committed to a review of flight bookings by government officials which will be conducted by the Department of Finance this
    year, despite there being just two months left of
    2024.

    Politicians’ preference for Qantas may also be
    put down to the airline’s exclusive invite-only ‘Chairman’s Lounge’.

    Australian politicians are almost always opting to fly
    with Qantas on taxpayer-funded trips, despite Virgin offering
    cheaper tickets. (pictured is Anthony Albanese, with former Qantas boss Alan Joyce, and fiancee Jodie
    Haydon)

    Read More

    EXCLUSIVE

    The Flying Kanga-RORT – why you’re footing the bill as airlines wine and dine pollies in VIP club

    Daily Mail Australia in August revealed that nearly every single federal politician in the country has accepted
    free membership of the club.

    Qantas and the Albanese government have both denied the airline enjoys any disproportionate level of
    influence over the country’s political classes.

    A Daily Mail Australia audit of the members’ interest registers – in both the House of Representatives and the Senate – revealed almost 93 per cent of the nation’s leaders have
    been ‘gifted’ membership to the lavish, all-inclusive lounge.

    The high profile ranks of government giftees
    include Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as well as every member of his 22-person Cabinet,
    his seven-person Outer Ministry and all 12 assistant
    ministers.

    While most politicians declared their Qantas’ privileges as a ‘gift’, Labor MP Marion Scrymgour listed her membership as her ‘Chairman Lounge
    entitlement’.

    Daily Mail Australia in August revealed that nearly every single federal politician in the
    country has accepted free membership of Qantas’ exclusive Chairman’s Lounge.

    And it’s not just politicians on the take, with more than 60
    MPs – including Marles, Chalmers, King, Bill Shorten, Zali Steggall and Tanya Plibersek – disclosing their spouses
    have also been granted unfettered, independent access to Qantas’ luxurious members only lounge.

    Often touted as ‘the most exclusive club in the country’, membership to the Chairman’s Lounge has long been veiled in secrecy.

    Even the entrances to each of the country’s six opulent VIP
    clubs – in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, Canberra and Perth airports – are suitably discreet.

    Though, once inside, the designer lounges are immediately more ostentatious,
    with free à la carte fine dining, table service, a decadent selection of wines and Champagne and a discreet army of dedicated
    lounge attendants.

    Membership to the club is ‘priceless’ – it cannot be bought for any amount of money nor obtained
    via any amount of frequent flyers points.

    Instead, each member is hand-picked and approved by the company’s
    chief executive and chairman.

    Qantas

    Reply ↓

  34. Следствие ведут уголовники. Действия следователей по «делу «Гермес Менеджмент»» шокируют даже судей
    Потерпевшие Бест Вей
    «Количество преступлений следственной группы по делу, связываемому следователями с кооперативом «Бест Вей», множится…»

    Следственная группа ГСУ ГУ МВД России по г. Санкт-Петербургу и Ленинградской области по уголовному делу, связываемому следователями с компаниями «Лайф-из-Гуд», «Гермес Менеджмент» и кооперативом «Бест Вей», однажды встав на путь совершения преступлений, никак не может остановиться.

    Подделка документов

    Количество преступлений следственной группы по делу, связываемому следователями с кооперативом «Бест Вей», множится: 1 декабря Приморский районный суд города Санкт-Петербурга вынужден был признать незаконным фактический отказ кооперативу в ознакомлении с материалами уголовного дела. При рассмотрении дела выяснилось, что следственная группа ГСУ питерского главка МВД, формально руководимая замначальника ГСУ полковником юстиции А.Н. Винокуровым, а фактически — подполковником юстиции Е.А. Сапетовой, подделала документы. Жалоба была подана адвокатом кооператива в июле, много раз ее рассмотрение откладывалось и вот наконец состоялось.

    Уличенная адвокатами кооператива в нарушении УПК, следственная группа составила письмо об удовлетворении ходатайства задним числом и попыталась представить дело так, что кооператив не получил письмо по своей вине. Очередная грубая работа, выявленная, как ни парадоксально, в том числе и с помощью системы электронного документооборота самого питерского главка МВД.
    Незаконное содержание под стражей

    Подделка документов была вынужденным преступлением для сокрытия более серьезного: незаконного содержания под стражей. Если бы следствие 4 июля с. г., как оно пишет в поддельных документах, пригласило кооператив для ознакомления с материалами уголовного дела, оно бы не успело за 30 суток до истечения предельного срока содержания четверых обвиняемых под стражей начать ознакомление обвиняемых с материалами дела, а это было единственное основание продления им срока содержания под стражей.

    Следственная группа из-за спешки даже толком не смогла завершить следственные действия, незаконно вела параллельное расследование по «резервному» делу, но сейчас, отбросив стыд, из-за отсутствия материала для составления «нужного» обвинительного заключения, незаконно продолжила расследование «основного» дела. Недавно СГ заявила о новой экспертизе — следственном действии, которое на этапе ознакомления с материалами дела обвиняемых противоречит УПК, предусматривающему четкую этапность завершения предварительного расследования.

    Следственная группа могла действовать по закону: просто продлить расследование — но тогда пришлось бы отпускать из-под стражи четверых обвиняемых, что, очевидно, противоречит ее плану держать их в заложниках.

    Признание судом первой инстанции незаконности невыполнения 216-й статьи УПК уже сейчас открывает возможности оспаривать октябрьские постановления судов о продлении «стражи» четверым обвиняемым: Уголовно-процессуальный кодекс, как уже было сказано, запрещает нарушение этапности и такое нарушение ведет к тому, что все этапы нужно осуществлять заново, а значит четверых обвиняемых нужно выпускать из СИЗО.

    Нет сомнений, что и следственная группа, и прокуратура предпримут меры давления на суд второй инстанции, чтобы максимально затянуть рассмотрение апелляции, и по возможности решение суда первой инстанции отменить или скорректировать. Давить на суд будут всей мощью административного веса руководства ГСУ.

    Reply ↓

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *