The Deep Speculation on the Vax

Posted on by

I have been thinking for a while that obviously that this vax is harmful and likely very dangerous but I want to hear some deep speculation on it.  So many people are guarded when they talk about it because they are often medical or another type of professional and don’t want to speculate too much.  Though I understand that people don’t want to go out too far on a limb, I think it is about time that we start speculating on what the ramifications of these vaccinations are going to be.

Here is what we know.

  1.  Everything points to the fact the whole pandemic was planned years in advance.
  2.  There seem many purposes to this plan but the vaccine seems to be the end goal, everything was about injecting a new gene therapy “vaccine” into every human being on the planet.
  3. We know almost nothing about this vaccine.  No animal trials were done and already the death count is higher than all other vaccines of the last 30 years combined. revovler news chart vax deaths
  4. We also know that every alternative treatment has been covered up.

So what is all this about?  If there really was a new dangerous pandemic sweeping the world why use a total novel technology of the mRNA vaccine?  Why not use a traditional vaccine?  Wouldn’t a traditional vaccine be the most safe and prudent route?  Why no long term studies on animals?  Why is phycological warfare being used on the public?  How is the CDC and the WHO been wrong on almost every point and contradict there own standards of pandemic response?  Why not have a rigorous tracking system to find out what is happening with vaccine injuries for a vaccine that is brand new and developed in less than a year as opposed to the usual ten years?

Intelligent people already know something is up, so now is the time for some healthy speculation in this writer’s humble opinion.  Luckily, Mike Adams from Natural News and Omaha native Dr. Lee Merritt discuss some of the more wild possibilities with the vaccine along with many interesting details that they have been hearing.

People have often been reported to be in a trance like state after taking the vaccine.

Why did the virus not spread throughout the world in the same way it did in New York, Lombardy, and Wuhan?  After these initial hot zones the virus seemed to get much more mild.  Was there some kind of genetic poison attack on these cities?

Are there nano technology in these vaccines?  Could they affect brain function and alter mood?  Could they be used for mind control?

The behavior of mice has been changed in the past through magnetic effects.

A wide range of reports show that people are being magnetized.

The spike protein has been found in the ovaries at a much higher concentration than other parts of the body.  Dr Lee Merritt says that they have the technology to target certain organs.

Doctors and nurses were vaccinated first, even over the elderly, did this somehow effect the critical thinking ability of the doctors?

Most strangely of all, there have been reports of people’s pets attacking them after they have received the vaccine.  Also babies have refused to nurse from their mothers after their mothers have been vaccinated (reported in Israel).   Are these vaccines changing human beings in some way we don’t understand?

If people’s DNA is being changed are they still human?  What is human?

Mike Adams and Dr Lee Merritt tackle all these questions and more.  Interesting times for humanity lie ahead.

mad max art 1

 

93,937 thoughts on “The Deep Speculation on the Vax”

  1. Astronomers briefly thought Elon Musk’s car was an asteroid. Here’s why that points to a broader problem
    sКракен тор
    Seven years after SpaceX launched Elon Musk’s cherry red sports car into orbit around our sun, astronomers unwittingly began paying attention to its movements once again.

    Observers spotted and correctly identified the vehicle as it started its extraterrestrial excursion in February 2018 — after it had blasted off into space during the Falcon Heavy rocket’s splashy maiden launch. But more recently, the car spawned a high-profile case of mistaken identity as space observers mistook it for an asteroid.
    Several observations of the vehicle, gathered by sweeping surveys of the night sky, were inadvertently stashed away in a database meant for miscellaneous and unknown objects, according to the International Astronomical Union’s Minor Planet Center.

    An amateur astronomer noticed a string of data points in January that appeared to fit together, describing the orbit of a relatively small object that was swooping between the orbital paths of Earth and Mars.

    The citizen scientist assumed the mystery object was an undocumented asteroid and promptly sent his findings to the MPC, which operates at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as a clearinghouse that seeks to catalog all known asteroids, comets and other small celestial bodies. An astronomer there verified the finding.

    And thus, the Minor Planet Center logged a new object, asteroid “2018 CN41.”

    Within 24 hours, however, the center retracted the designation.

    The person who originally flagged the object realized their own error, MPC astronomer Peter Veres told CNN, noticing that they had, in fact, found several uncorrelated observations of Musk’s car. And the center’s systems hadn’t caught the error.

    Reply ↓

  2. Astronomers briefly thought Elon Musk’s car was an asteroid. Here’s why that points to a broader problem
    skra28 cc
    Seven years after SpaceX launched Elon Musk’s cherry red sports car into orbit around our sun, astronomers unwittingly began paying attention to its movements once again.

    Observers spotted and correctly identified the vehicle as it started its extraterrestrial excursion in February 2018 — after it had blasted off into space during the Falcon Heavy rocket’s splashy maiden launch. But more recently, the car spawned a high-profile case of mistaken identity as space observers mistook it for an asteroid.
    Several observations of the vehicle, gathered by sweeping surveys of the night sky, were inadvertently stashed away in a database meant for miscellaneous and unknown objects, according to the International Astronomical Union’s Minor Planet Center.

    An amateur astronomer noticed a string of data points in January that appeared to fit together, describing the orbit of a relatively small object that was swooping between the orbital paths of Earth and Mars.

    The citizen scientist assumed the mystery object was an undocumented asteroid and promptly sent his findings to the MPC, which operates at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as a clearinghouse that seeks to catalog all known asteroids, comets and other small celestial bodies. An astronomer there verified the finding.

    And thus, the Minor Planet Center logged a new object, asteroid “2018 CN41.”

    Within 24 hours, however, the center retracted the designation.

    The person who originally flagged the object realized their own error, MPC astronomer Peter Veres told CNN, noticing that they had, in fact, found several uncorrelated observations of Musk’s car. And the center’s systems hadn’t caught the error.

    Reply ↓

  7. Astronomers briefly thought Elon Musk’s car was an asteroid. Here’s why that points to a broader problem
    skraken
    Seven years after SpaceX launched Elon Musk’s cherry red sports car into orbit around our sun, astronomers unwittingly began paying attention to its movements once again.

    Observers spotted and correctly identified the vehicle as it started its extraterrestrial excursion in February 2018 — after it had blasted off into space during the Falcon Heavy rocket’s splashy maiden launch. But more recently, the car spawned a high-profile case of mistaken identity as space observers mistook it for an asteroid.
    Several observations of the vehicle, gathered by sweeping surveys of the night sky, were inadvertently stashed away in a database meant for miscellaneous and unknown objects, according to the International Astronomical Union’s Minor Planet Center.

    An amateur astronomer noticed a string of data points in January that appeared to fit together, describing the orbit of a relatively small object that was swooping between the orbital paths of Earth and Mars.

    The citizen scientist assumed the mystery object was an undocumented asteroid and promptly sent his findings to the MPC, which operates at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as a clearinghouse that seeks to catalog all known asteroids, comets and other small celestial bodies. An astronomer there verified the finding.

    And thus, the Minor Planet Center logged a new object, asteroid “2018 CN41.”

    Within 24 hours, however, the center retracted the designation.

    The person who originally flagged the object realized their own error, MPC astronomer Peter Veres told CNN, noticing that they had, in fact, found several uncorrelated observations of Musk’s car. And the center’s systems hadn’t caught the error.

    Reply ↓

  8. Does your site have a contact page? I’m having a tough time locating it but,
    I’d like to send you an e-mail. I’ve got some ideas for your blog you might be interested in hearing.
    Either way, great blog and I look forward to seeing it improve
    over time.

    Reply ↓

  11. Howdy, i read your blog from time to time and i own a similar one and i was
    just curious if you get a lot of spam feedback?

    If so how do you prevent it, any plugin or anything you can recommend?
    I get so much lately it’s driving me insane so any assistance is very much appreciated.

    Reply ↓

  12. Astronomers briefly thought Elon Musk’s car was an asteroid. Here’s why that points to a broader problem
    skra27 cc
    Seven years after SpaceX launched Elon Musk’s cherry red sports car into orbit around our sun, astronomers unwittingly began paying attention to its movements once again.

    Observers spotted and correctly identified the vehicle as it started its extraterrestrial excursion in February 2018 — after it had blasted off into space during the Falcon Heavy rocket’s splashy maiden launch. But more recently, the car spawned a high-profile case of mistaken identity as space observers mistook it for an asteroid.
    Several observations of the vehicle, gathered by sweeping surveys of the night sky, were inadvertently stashed away in a database meant for miscellaneous and unknown objects, according to the International Astronomical Union’s Minor Planet Center.

    An amateur astronomer noticed a string of data points in January that appeared to fit together, describing the orbit of a relatively small object that was swooping between the orbital paths of Earth and Mars.

    The citizen scientist assumed the mystery object was an undocumented asteroid and promptly sent his findings to the MPC, which operates at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as a clearinghouse that seeks to catalog all known asteroids, comets and other small celestial bodies. An astronomer there verified the finding.

    And thus, the Minor Planet Center logged a new object, asteroid “2018 CN41.”

    Within 24 hours, however, the center retracted the designation.

    The person who originally flagged the object realized their own error, MPC astronomer Peter Veres told CNN, noticing that they had, in fact, found several uncorrelated observations of Musk’s car. And the center’s systems hadn’t caught the error.

    Reply ↓

  18. Taking into account success indicators, the high quality of positional research creates the need to include a number of extraordinary measures in the production plan, taking into account the complex of the mass participation system. In the same way, the beginning of everyday work on the formation of a position does not give us other choice, except for determining the clustering of efforts.

    Reply ↓

  29. It is difficult to say why the elements of the political process, overcoming the current difficult economic situation, are blocked in the framework of their own rational restrictions. Gentlemen, the strengthening and development of the internal structure is perfect for the implementation of the timely fulfillment of the super -task.

    Reply ↓

  36. Хватит играть вслепую! Забудьте о проигрышах и разводах!

    Приветствуем в телеграм-канале, где РЕЙТИНГ казино становится вашим надежным проводником в мире азарта!

    В 2025 году онлайн-казино расцветают, но как найти среди них лучшие, честные и надежные? Мы сделали это за вас!

    Здесь вы найдете:

    ТОП самых популярных и лучших официальных онлайн казино с лицензией.
    Обзоры, которые помогут найти официальное зеркало для входа на официальный сайт. Больше не нужно искать рабочее!
    Эксклюзивные промокоды и щедрые бонусы, включая бездепозитный бонус, чтобы играть бесплатно!
    Подробный анализ игровых автоматов, слотов и шансов сорвать джекпот!
    Инструкции, как правильно пройти регистрацию и начать играть в интернете на реальные деньги.
    Возможность скачать приложение казино для игры в любое время и в любом месте.
    Мы поможем вам:

    Избежать мошенников.
    Найти самые выгодные предложения.
    Сорвать большой куш!
    Не тратьте время на поиски! Подписывайтесь сейчас и начните играть с умом!

    https://t.me/s/topkazino10

    Станьте профессионалом в мире онлайн-казино!

    Reply ↓

  37. I do believe all the ideas you have offered for your post.

    They’re really convincing and can certainly work. Nonetheless, the posts are very quick for novices.
    Could you please lengthen them a bit from next time?

    Thank you for the post.

    Reply ↓

  44. When I initially commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is
    added I get four e-mails with the same comment. Is there any
    way you can remove me from that service? Many
    thanks!

    Reply ↓

  46. Definitely, the actions of opposition representatives, initiated exclusively synthetically, are described as detailed as possible. Our business is not as unambiguous as it might seem: promising planning plays decisive importance for the withdrawal of current assets.

    Reply ↓

  47. Нетратьте время ЗРЯ видел оценил
    also on the potrade project|platform, you find many bonuses, which will allow you to increase own account or make risk-free transactions.

    Reply ↓

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *