Tucker Carlson Interviews Dr. Peter McCullough on COVID Worldwide Conspiracy

Of course, the word conspiracy is not used.  Professional people do not use such a word.  And we are all professionals here and everything is under control.  Well, actually, everything is not under control and something is “very very wrong” but we should not think to be deeply about such things, right?

Basically Doctor Peter McCullough goes into great lengths explaining how there are many treatments for Covid but that they are never mentioned and even actively suppressed. Both Doctor Peter McCullough and Tucker are trying to wrap their minds around this and seem to be totally baffled on how such treatments can be ignored.  There is too much in this interview to sum up here and it is worth watching in whole.

 

 

The is one thing I have been meaning to mention and it was brought up in this interview. The Lancet, the most prestigious medical journal in the world, published a paper that claimed the hydroxychloroquine is deadly.  This turned out to be completely false. In addition to this medicine being used very successfully for 40 years, the sources for the paper were obviously fraudulent.  For those that might not be familiar with academic writing, this is a huge deal. This simply does not happen, and was obviously published fraudulently on purpose.   It was retracted a couple weeks later but the world wide damage had already been done and the media never covered the retraction.  This one incident alone should set off the alarm bells.  For the most prestigious academic journal in the world to outright lie and potentially lead to millions of deaths from a deadly virus, the term “mind blowing” does not even come close to doing justice to what this information implies.  I have to emphasize again.  This is an academic journal, with editors and peer review.  Most people get rejected for the smallest of errors. To get published at all is an incredible feat and the level of scientific rigor of such a journal is always beyond reproach. Well, not this time apparently.  Right when humanity needed an objective medical opinion to what was to be done, (with what was the thought to be the one of the most dangerous plagues in modern history) what did humanity get from the medical elite?  Lies. What does such a lie imply?  I don’t know if words can do such a crime justice.  Purposeful mass killing of millions.  What is the word for that? I will let the reader figure that out.  More concerning in my mind, what comes next?

236,720 thoughts on “Tucker Carlson Interviews Dr. Peter McCullough on COVID Worldwide Conspiracy

  1. Hello! Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with us so I came to look it over. I’m definitely enjoying the information. I’m book-marking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Excellent blog and excellent design and style.

  2. Howdy! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyhow, I’m definitely glad I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back often!

  3. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your
    point. You obviously know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your blog when you
    could be giving us something enlightening to read?

  4. The clarity of our position is obvious: the strengthening and development of the internal structure indicates the possibilities of the progress of the professional community. As has already been repeatedly mentioned, many well -known personalities are nothing more than the quintessence of the victory of marketing over the mind and should be turned into a laughing stock, although their very existence brings undoubted benefit to society.

  5. With every thing that appears to be building inside this subject material, many of your points of view are rather stimulating. Even so, I beg your pardon, because I can not subscribe to your whole plan, all be it radical none the less. It would seem to us that your remarks are actually not totally validated and in simple fact you are yourself not really fully convinced of the assertion. In any event I did appreciate examining it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *