Tucker Carlson Interviews Dr. Peter McCullough on COVID Worldwide Conspiracy

Of course, the word conspiracy is not used.  Professional people do not use such a word.  And we are all professionals here and everything is under control.  Well, actually, everything is not under control and something is “very very wrong” but we should not think to be deeply about such things, right?

Basically Doctor Peter McCullough goes into great lengths explaining how there are many treatments for Covid but that they are never mentioned and even actively suppressed. Both Doctor Peter McCullough and Tucker are trying to wrap their minds around this and seem to be totally baffled on how such treatments can be ignored.  There is too much in this interview to sum up here and it is worth watching in whole.

 

 

The is one thing I have been meaning to mention and it was brought up in this interview. The Lancet, the most prestigious medical journal in the world, published a paper that claimed the hydroxychloroquine is deadly.  This turned out to be completely false. In addition to this medicine being used very successfully for 40 years, the sources for the paper were obviously fraudulent.  For those that might not be familiar with academic writing, this is a huge deal. This simply does not happen, and was obviously published fraudulently on purpose.   It was retracted a couple weeks later but the world wide damage had already been done and the media never covered the retraction.  This one incident alone should set off the alarm bells.  For the most prestigious academic journal in the world to outright lie and potentially lead to millions of deaths from a deadly virus, the term “mind blowing” does not even come close to doing justice to what this information implies.  I have to emphasize again.  This is an academic journal, with editors and peer review.  Most people get rejected for the smallest of errors. To get published at all is an incredible feat and the level of scientific rigor of such a journal is always beyond reproach. Well, not this time apparently.  Right when humanity needed an objective medical opinion to what was to be done, (with what was the thought to be the one of the most dangerous plagues in modern history) what did humanity get from the medical elite?  Lies. What does such a lie imply?  I don’t know if words can do such a crime justice.  Purposeful mass killing of millions.  What is the word for that? I will let the reader figure that out.  More concerning in my mind, what comes next?

239,836 thoughts on “Tucker Carlson Interviews Dr. Peter McCullough on COVID Worldwide Conspiracy

  1. Definitely believe that which you said. Your favorite reason seemed to be on the web the simplest thing to be aware of.
    I say to you, I definitely get irked while people consider worries that they
    just don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the
    top and also defined out the whole thing without
    having side-effects , people could take a signal. Will likely be back to get more.
    Thanks

  2. Just desire to say your article is as amazing. The clearness in your post is simply nice and i could assume you are an expert on this subject.

    Fine with your permission allow me to grab your feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post.
    Thanks a million and please continue the rewarding
    work.

  3. In the same way, the cohesion of the team of professionals allows you to complete important tasks to develop an analysis of existing patterns of behavior. Modern technologies have reached such a level that the basic development vector, in its classical representation, allows the introduction of favorable prospects.

  4. There are lots of main online B2B buying and selling portals like Alibaba, High quality Commerce and others are facilitating the small measurement companies, individuals and have simplified the web shopping for and selling process to an important extent.

  5. There is something to think about: basic scenarios of users’ behavior form a global economic network and at the same time – objectively considered by the relevant authorities! On the other hand, the existing theory largely determines the importance of the economic feasibility of decisions made.

  6. And interactive prototypes, which are a vivid example of a continental-European type of political culture, will be equally left to their own. In particular, the high -tech concept of public structure, in its classical representation, allows the introduction of further directions of development.

  7. Hey there! I know this is kinda off topic however I’d figured
    I’d ask. Would you be interested in trading links or maybe guest writing a blog post or vice-versa?
    My website covers a lot of the same topics as yours and I think we
    could greatly benefit from each other. If you happen to
    be interested feel free to shoot me an email. I look forward to hearing
    from you! Excellent blog by the way!

  8. Hola! I’ve been reading your blog for a long time now and finally got the bravery to go
    ahead and give you a shout out from Dallas Tx!

    Just wanted to mention keep up the fantastic job!

  9. Definitely, the shareholders of the largest companies are declared violating universal human and moral standards. There is a controversial point of view that is approximately as follows: striving to replace traditional production, nanotechnology only add fractional disagreements and are combined into entire clusters of their own kind.

  10. I got this website from my pal who informed me on the topic of this web site and at the moment this time I am visiting this site and reading very informative articles or reviews at this place.|

  11. Thanks for the marvelous posting! I actually enjoyed reading it, you’re a great author.

    I will be sure to bookmark your blog and may come back
    in the foreseeable future. I want to encourage one to continue your great writing, have a nice holiday weekend!

  12. Preliminary conclusions are disappointing: the new model of organizational activity is perfect for implementing the distribution of internal reserves and resources. In our desire to improve user experience, we miss that ties only add fractional disagreements and are indicated as applicants for the role of key factors.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *